* fix for rust build
* Rust: Implement Serialize on generated types
For debugging convenience it is really handy to be able to dump out
types as another format (ie: json). For example, if we are logging a
type to a structured logging system, or even printing it out in a
structured way to the console.
Right now we handle this by shelling out to `flatc` which is not ideal;
by implementing Serialize on the generated types we can use any of the
Serializer-implementing packages for our structured debug output.
* clang-format
* Make the flatbuffers Rust crate only have an optional dependency on the `serde` packages.
* fix warning
* fix rust test build
* Oh yeah this needs to be initialized
* fix toml syntax
* code review feedback
* rebuild test data
* [ts] Builder incorrectly serializing empty strings
The builder was returning an offset of zero for empty strings. This is
leading to flatbuffers which fail verification in other languages, such
as Rust.
* tests expect 0 offset for null or undefined strings
* [TS] Fix four bugs with imported types in TypeScript.
* When a type had a vector of imported enums:
1) the enum type's file wasn't added to the generated code's list of
imports; and
2) the enum wasn't prefixed with the NS<hash> prefix and wasn't getting
resolved; but
3) non-enum types (ie, "flatbuffers.Offset") were getting the NS<hash>
prefix when they weren't.
* Also, type name prefixes weren't properly attributed with imported
structs in unions because the source definition passed to the typename
prefixing method was for the union, not for the location of the imported
struct.
* clang fmt
* Use of enum_def / struct_def for prefixing types needs to have the files
added to imported files when not generating all types.
* clang fmt
When either source or destination or both namespaces were empty, flatc
was generating incorrect TS code.
For example:
```
export namespace {
export import ObjectId = NS10770172024577249292..ObjectId;}
```
In this case the target namespace is empty, and so is the namespace
between the NSxxx placeholder and the target type.
* [typescript/javascript] Size-prefixed root accessor needs to account for the size prefix.
* [typescript] Add parentheses after "new" expression.
* Update generated test files
* Bugfix for Rust generation of union fields named with language keywords
Looking at ParseField, it appears that in the case of unions, an extra field with a `UnionTypeFieldSuffix` is added to the type definition, however, if the name of this field is a keyword in the target language, it isn't escaped.
For example, if generating code for rust for a union field named `type`, flatc will generate a (non-keyword escaped) field named `type_type` for this hidden union field, and one (keyword escaped) called `type_` for the actual union contents.
When the union accessors are generated, they refer to this `type_type` field, but they will escape it mistakenly, generating code like this:
```
#[inline]
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
pub fn type__as_int(&self) -> Option<Int<'a>> {
if self.type__type() == Type::Int {
self.type_().map(|u| Int::init_from_table(u))
} else {
None
}
}
```
Which will fail to build because the field is called `self.type_type()`, not `self.type__type()`.
* [Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes.
At present if a flatbuffer description includes a reference to a type in
another file, the generated Rust code needs to be hand-modified to add
the appropriate `use` statements.
This assumes that the dependencies are built into the same crate, which
I think is a reasonable assumption?
* Revert "[Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes."
This reverts commit d554d79fec.
* Add updated generated test files.
* Fixing Rust test harness to handle new includes.
Test binaries need to add references to generated code that's
transitively included.
This also has the knock-on in that this code (which is referenced by
include directives directly in the flatbuffer schema files) also needs
to be generated, hence the changes to generate_code.sh.
* Test harnesses expect test data to be checked in.
Put include_test2 files into the same directory as the include_test2
schema definition.
Update all code generation scripts (forgot the batch file from last
time).
Path updates in Rust test.
* Include updated generated code
* Address comments raised in PR
* Fix failing Rust tests.
* Previous merge clobbered this branch change.
* Add updated imports to benchmarks.
* Clarifying comment per PR request
* Update documentation comments per feedback
* Remove non-Rust generated files for include tests, per feedback from @rw/@aardappel
* Broken code generation batch file
* Fix typo
* Add TODO for tidying up use declaration traversal sometime in the future
* Update test files.
* Bugfix for Rust generation of union fields named with language keywords
Looking at ParseField, it appears that in the case of unions, an extra field with a `UnionTypeFieldSuffix` is added to the type definition, however, if the name of this field is a keyword in the target language, it isn't escaped.
For example, if generating code for rust for a union field named `type`, flatc will generate a (non-keyword escaped) field named `type_type` for this hidden union field, and one (keyword escaped) called `type_` for the actual union contents.
When the union accessors are generated, they refer to this `type_type` field, but they will escape it mistakenly, generating code like this:
```
#[inline]
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
pub fn type__as_int(&self) -> Option<Int<'a>> {
if self.type__type() == Type::Int {
self.type_().map(|u| Int::init_from_table(u))
} else {
None
}
}
```
Which will fail to build because the field is called `self.type_type()`, not `self.type__type()`.
* [Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes.
At present if a flatbuffer description includes a reference to a type in
another file, the generated Rust code needs to be hand-modified to add
the appropriate `use` statements.
This assumes that the dependencies are built into the same crate, which
I think is a reasonable assumption?
* Revert "[Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes."
This reverts commit d554d79fec.
* Address comments raised in PR
* Update documentation comments per feedback
* Fix typo
* [rust] Make enum variant names public.
* Update generated test files
* Add test for public enum names
* Bugfix for Rust generation of union fields named with language keywords
Looking at ParseField, it appears that in the case of unions, an extra field with a `UnionTypeFieldSuffix` is added to the type definition, however, if the name of this field is a keyword in the target language, it isn't escaped.
For example, if generating code for rust for a union field named `type`, flatc will generate a (non-keyword escaped) field named `type_type` for this hidden union field, and one (keyword escaped) called `type_` for the actual union contents.
When the union accessors are generated, they refer to this `type_type` field, but they will escape it mistakenly, generating code like this:
```
#[inline]
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
pub fn type__as_int(&self) -> Option<Int<'a>> {
if self.type__type() == Type::Int {
self.type_().map(|u| Int::init_from_table(u))
} else {
None
}
}
```
Which will fail to build because the field is called `self.type_type()`, not `self.type__type()`.
* [Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes.
At present if a flatbuffer description includes a reference to a type in
another file, the generated Rust code needs to be hand-modified to add
the appropriate `use` statements.
This assumes that the dependencies are built into the same crate, which
I think is a reasonable assumption?
* Revert "[Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes."
This reverts commit d554d79fec.
* Address comments raised in PR
* Update documentation comments per feedback
* Fix typo
Max Burke