forked from BigfootDev/flatbuffers
Revamping the FlatBuffers docs.
Adding an API reference for the supported languages. General docs cleanup, including a new `tutorial` section that supports all of the supported languages. Added samples for each supported language to mirror the new tutorial page. Cleaned up all the links by making them `@ref` style links, instead of referencing the names of the generated `.html` files. Removed all generated files that were unnecessarily committed. Also fixed the C# tests (two were failing due to a missing file). Bug: b/25801305 Tested: Tested all samples on Ubuntu, Mac, and Android. Docs were generated using doxygen and viewed on Chrome. Change-Id: I2acaba6e332a15ae2deff5f26a4a25da7bd2c954
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Contributing {#contributing}
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Want to contribute? Great! First, read this page (including the small print at
|
||||
the end).
|
||||
|
||||
# Before you contribute
|
||||
Before we can use your code, you must sign the
|
||||
[Google Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://developers.google.com/open-source/cla/individual?csw=1)
|
||||
(CLA), which you can do online. The CLA is necessary mainly because you own the
|
||||
copyright to your changes, even after your contribution becomes part of our
|
||||
codebase, so we need your permission to use and distribute your code. We also
|
||||
need to be sure of various other things—for instance that you'll tell us if you
|
||||
know that your code infringes on other people's patents. You don't have to sign
|
||||
the CLA until after you've submitted your code for review and a member has
|
||||
approved it, but you must do it before we can put your code into our codebase.
|
||||
Before you start working on a larger contribution, you should get in touch with
|
||||
us first through the issue tracker with your idea so that we can help out and
|
||||
possibly guide you. Coordinating up front makes it much easier to avoid
|
||||
frustration later on.
|
||||
|
||||
# Code reviews
|
||||
All submissions, including submissions by project members, require review. We
|
||||
use Github pull requests for this purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
Some tips for good pull requests:
|
||||
* Use our code
|
||||
[style guide](http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.html).
|
||||
When in doubt, try to stay true to the existing code of the project.
|
||||
* Write a descriptive commit message. What problem are you solving and what
|
||||
are the consequences? Where and what did you test? Some good tips:
|
||||
[here](http://robots.thoughtbot.com/5-useful-tips-for-a-better-commit-message)
|
||||
and [here](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches).
|
||||
* If your PR consists of multiple commits which are successive improvements /
|
||||
fixes to your first commit, consider squashing them into a single commit
|
||||
(`git rebase -i`) such that your PR is a single commit on top of the current
|
||||
HEAD. This make reviewing the code so much easier, and our history more
|
||||
readable.
|
||||
|
||||
# The small print
|
||||
Contributions made by corporations are covered by a different agreement than
|
||||
the one above, the Software Grant and Corporate Contributor License Agreement.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user