mirror of
https://github.com/google/flatbuffers.git
synced 2026-06-02 04:04:19 +00:00
355dfd48d1
* Bugfix for Rust generation of union fields named with language keywords
Looking at ParseField, it appears that in the case of unions, an extra field with a `UnionTypeFieldSuffix` is added to the type definition, however, if the name of this field is a keyword in the target language, it isn't escaped.
For example, if generating code for rust for a union field named `type`, flatc will generate a (non-keyword escaped) field named `type_type` for this hidden union field, and one (keyword escaped) called `type_` for the actual union contents.
When the union accessors are generated, they refer to this `type_type` field, but they will escape it mistakenly, generating code like this:
```
#[inline]
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
pub fn type__as_int(&self) -> Option<Int<'a>> {
if self.type__type() == Type::Int {
self.type_().map(|u| Int::init_from_table(u))
} else {
None
}
}
```
Which will fail to build because the field is called `self.type_type()`, not `self.type__type()`.
* [Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes.
At present if a flatbuffer description includes a reference to a type in
another file, the generated Rust code needs to be hand-modified to add
the appropriate `use` statements.
This assumes that the dependencies are built into the same crate, which
I think is a reasonable assumption?
* Revert "[Rust] Add crate-relative use statements for FBS includes."
This reverts commit d554d79fec.
* Address comments raised in PR
* Update documentation comments per feedback
* Fix typo
* [rust] Make enum variant names public.
* Update generated test files
* Add test for public enum names