Fix ambiguity of a type deduction in TEST_EQ macro if arguments have enum class type. (#5630)

This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Glavnyy
2019-11-26 03:56:47 +07:00
committed by Wouter van Oortmerssen
parent 075e8d676b
commit c3c32ec942
4 changed files with 100 additions and 43 deletions

View File

@@ -16,17 +16,17 @@
{ printf(__VA_ARGS__); printf("\n"); }
#endif
#define TEST_EQ(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#define TEST_ASSERT(exp) TestEq(exp, true, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#define TEST_NOTNULL(exp) TestEq(exp == NULL, false, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#define TEST_EQ_STR(exp, val) TestEqStr(exp, val, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#define TEST_EQ(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, "'" #exp "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, "")
#define TEST_ASSERT(val) TestEq(true, !!(val), "'" "true" "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, "")
#define TEST_NOTNULL(val) TestEq(true, (val) != nullptr, "'" "nullptr" "' == '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, "")
#define TEST_EQ_STR(exp, val) TestEqStr(exp, val, "'" #exp "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, "")
#ifdef _WIN32
#define TEST_ASSERT_FUNC(exp) TestEq(exp, true, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_EQ_FUNC(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_ASSERT_FUNC(val) TestEq(true, !!(val), "'" "true" "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_EQ_FUNC(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, "'" #exp "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__)
#else
#define TEST_ASSERT_FUNC(exp) TestEq(exp, true, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_EQ_FUNC(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, #exp, __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_ASSERT_FUNC(val) TestEq(true, !!(val), "'" "true" "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__)
#define TEST_EQ_FUNC(exp, val) TestEq(exp, val, "'" #exp "' != '" #val "'", __FILE__, __LINE__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__)
#endif
// clang-format on
@@ -54,14 +54,55 @@ void TestFail(const char *expval, const char *val, const char *exp,
const char *file, int line, const char *func = 0);
void TestEqStr(const char *expval, const char *val, const char *exp,
const char *file, int line);
const char *file, int line, const char *func = 0);
// Workaround for `enum class` printing.
// There is an issue with the printing of enums with a fixed underlying type.
// These enums are generated by `flatc` if `--scoped-enums` is active.
// All modern compilers have problems with `std::stringstream&<<(T v)` if T is
// an enum with fixed type. For details see DR1601:
// http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1601
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34336024/ambiguous-overload-when-writing-an-enum-with-an-enum-base-but-only-with-clang
template<typename T, bool is_enum_type = flatbuffers::is_enum<T>::value>
struct underlying_of_scalar {
static_assert(flatbuffers::is_scalar<T>::value, "invalid type T");
typedef T type;
};
template<typename T> struct underlying_of_scalar<T, true> {
// clang-format off
// There are old compilers without full C++11 support (see stl_emulation.h).
#if defined(FLATBUFFERS_TEMPLATES_ALIASES) && !defined(FLATBUFFERS_CPP98_STL)
using type = typename std::underlying_type<T>::type;
#else
typedef int64_t type;
#endif
// clang-format on
};
template<typename T>
typename underlying_of_scalar<T>::type scalar_as_underlying(T v) {
return static_cast<typename underlying_of_scalar<T>::type>(v);
}
template<typename T, typename U>
void TestEq(T expval, U val, const char *exp, const char *file, int line,
const char *func = 0) {
if (U(expval) != val) {
TestFail(flatbuffers::NumToString(expval).c_str(),
flatbuffers::NumToString(val).c_str(), exp, file, line, func);
const char *func) {
if (static_cast<U>(expval) != val) {
TestFail(flatbuffers::NumToString(scalar_as_underlying(expval)).c_str(),
flatbuffers::NumToString(scalar_as_underlying(val)).c_str(), exp,
file, line, func);
}
}
template<>
inline void TestEq<std::string, std::string>(std::string expval,
std::string val, const char *exp,
const char *file, int line,
const char *func) {
if (expval != val) {
TestFail(expval.c_str(), val.c_str(), exp, file, line, func);
}
}